El Nombre

Intro

Comprehending the Name is a key to living on this existence plane since we discover that legal name fraud is the biggest fraud perpetrated on humanity. Through fraud, it is possible to transfer all aspects of the living being in flesh, bones and blood to a non-existent and fictitious character inscribed on a two-dimensional paper. The implicit and hidden identification process conferred by the Name induces silent acceptance to accepting the contract proposal and be considered that Name. That is known as ‘Deminutio Capitis Maxima’ within the Name has a legal status. That legal status allows someone representing the “state” (another non-existent entity) to have power over who identifies himself with that Name.

dynamic index

Nomen est omen - A name an omen

Nomen est omen, Literally: a Name a Destiny, the Name is an Omen or the Destiny is in the Name. With this maxim the ancient Romans described the symbolic characteristics of the Name. The habit that origin this locution is that in the past Names were attributed based on physical atrivutes and professions. An self recognition between those aspects and the living being that responded to that Name, and as a self-fulfilling prophecy, the constant repetition of that Name ended up producing a custom to limit oneself only in these aspects.

Various cultures developed different modalities regarding the assignment of names, producing various incisive effects in the mind of the bearer of the Name, what we can properly call “spells”.

The man has a predisposition to the creation, understanding and assimilation of symbols and language. These characteristics produce that all the stimuli received by the sensory organs are mediated and filtered by the linguistic structures culturaly based. Whether we do not develop the capacity for internal observation of these linguistic aspects, they will be able to conditioning our thoughts, reasoning, decisions, emotions and moods and creating a certain ‘mental inertia’.

The interior mind vision does not recognize the difference between a ‘real image’ and an ‘imagined’ when something is represented internally in our mind. Mind always considers real any interior vision, whether we know it conscious or unconsciously. These mind mechanisms used to take advantage of the fact that if called, we respond to a Name and through ‘Names’ we achieved the current modality of using it that allowed the creation of legal fiction.

The name in some ancient cultures

Sioux children were not given names at birth, rather they were given nicknames, and additional nicknames would be added throughout their lives. As they grew up, some boys earned nicknames by doing an act of bravery, others earned nicknames by displaying a special talent, such as being an excellent hunter, a good salesman, or a great storyteller.

This mechanism does not leave the individual who is subject to that significant event free of stigma every time he is called, although the culture allows the nickname to be changed at any time, a significant fact is required to generate it, and meanwhile that fact is crystallized in the subconscious of the individual.

Another very interesting modality can be discovered in Chinese culture, in a Chinese name the last name is placed before the given name, which are generally used together most of the time. For example, Mao Zedong, the founder of the People’s Republic of China, Mao is his last name and Zedong is his first name.

Chinese surnames are generally composed of a single 汉字 (hànzì) or character. Two of them are rarely used and less frequently a surname can take more than two 汉字 (hànzì).

Likewise, given names can have from one to three characters 汉字 (hànzì) and must be coherent both from the point of view of sound and meaning with the surname that they must accompany. In the most traditional families, the Five Elements (五行, wǔxíng) -fire (火, huǒ), water (水, shǔi), wood (木, mù), metal (金, jīn) and earth (土) are also taken into account. , tǔ)- as a sound and meaning that associated with the Chinese zodiac sign play a determining role when defining a name.

We can see how this modality of merging the surname and the name reinforces the collective and family mechanisms that are placed before the individual, creating the effect of putting the individual name in the background.

In general, parents choose names with characters whose meanings they hope their children will embody, since it is believed that they could influence their career or profession, their lives, their work or even their marriage.

In ancient Rome all Roman citizens free by birth or freed from slavery had three names: praenomen, nomen, and cognomen.

Praenomen: it was equivalent to our first name and was imposed by the parents on the child on the day of birth (Aulus, Appius, Gaius, Decimus, Marcus, Publius, Servius, Titus). Often all the firstborn in a family carried the same praenomen. Women generally did not have it and called themselves with the nomen of the gens (lineage) to which they belonged, sometimes softened by a term of affection: the daughter of Marco Tullio Cicero was called Tulliola.

Nomen: It was the equivalent of what we now call a surname, although our surname currently corresponds to the Cognomen (Cognome in Italian translates into surname), it was the noble name and indicated the members of a gens, that is, the descendants of the same ancestors. It was expressed with an adjective ending in -ius, which indicated belonging to a lineage: Marcus Iulius meant “Marco degli Iulii” (descendants of Iulus, legendary son of Aeneas). It was used to identify social position, indicating the seniority of the family, but it was also used by commoner families.

Cognomen: Triumphal nicknames and surnames. The third neminative, the cognomen, was a nickname added to the noble nomen. Initially it was individual and could also be a popular nickname: Lentulus comes from lentil, Cicero from chickpea (Ceci), Lepidus as a joke. Then it became hereditary and served to distinguish the various branches of the same gens: for example, the Corneli Cathegi from the Corneli Scipiones. Finally, there were the triumphant surnames, conferred on the victors: Scipio, who became African after the victory over Carthage, the full trinomial of him was Publio Cornelius Scipio Africanus.

Slaves had only the nomen: if freed they assumed the surname and often the praenomen of their former master as well.

The name its hidden meaning and phonosymbolism

We can note that the word ‘name’ itself hides a hidden meaning in the specific case of Spanish it’s ‘nombre’, dividing that word we obtain “no hombre” the meaning of “non-man” with all the aspects that this entails for those who are delving into the aspects of the individual sovereignty and self-determination. The Italian word for name, that is, ‘nome’, is even more illuminating, since this is the sum of the negation of being, that is, ‘no-me’, that is, ‘not me’.

Having said this, it is also important to consider that whoever reaches the information of self-determination to the word ‘name’ begins to call it ‘appellate’, which is also made up of a sound, a sound made up of an emanation of frequencies and which, according to scientific studies, can influence matter, as we can see in the Cymatics experiments where it is demonstrated how frequencies inform matter and substantially generate geometric shapes, this indelible relationship between frequency and shape, or as one could say between shape and substance, we can find it in many expressions of nature.

We will not expand the subject of cymatics in this section, but to be more specific I will cite a study of ‘Phonosymbolism’ By the kiki-bouba experiment: in 1929 the German psychologist Wolfgang Kohler subjected several speakers to vision in two ways: one with angular sides, the other with smooth lines, and asked which of the two was “bouba”. and which “kiki”. 95% of people, regardless of language, responded that kikif was the angular shape and bouba the sinuous: it is no coincidence that there is a rounding of the lips to pronounce /b/, while they are tense to pronounce voiceless stops such as /k/ and /t/, discontinuous consonants that cause abrupt interruptions. Therefore, the two figures were explicitly linked to the presumed names.

This principle is well known in the “Naming” environment where sound symbolism is used to interconnect the name of a company with its logo.

Phonosymbolism – Kiki o Bouda

Meaning of Phonosymbolism

In linguistics, phonosymbolism indicates the ability of speech sounds to interact through their acoustic and articulatory qualities with the meaning of the terms they convey.

Phonosymbolism or secondary or expressive onomatopoeia is also a capacity of sounds to evoke not an acoustic category, but a movement, or some physical or moral quality, usually unfavorable. Thus, it is not about reproducing a real sound, but suggesting, through the phonetics of the word, an idea, a sensation or an action.

Returning to the active aspects of naming, as stated in the Bible, it was man who gave names to all living beings.

– Then the Lord God said: «It is not good for man to be alone. I will make an ideal aid for him». Then the Lord God formed out of the ground all the wild animals and all the birds of the sky. He put them in front of the man to see what he would call them, and the man chose a name for each of them. He named all the domestic animals, all the birds of the sky, and all the wild animals; but there was not yet an ideal helper for him. –

This aspect of the assignment of “names” exposes us to more elements of the creation of ‘man’ than of the world itself as it is generally interpreted, since the mind of man is predisposed to assimilate symbolic aspects and assign them to real facts, creating a distance between reality and the object represented, through symbolism and language, creating an interpretation of reality that is not reality itself.

It is clearly stated by a well-known NLP axiom:

“The map is not the territory”

Alfred Korzybski                    

Likewise, returning to the myths, we observe how the god Thoth is considered the god of wisdom and had authority over all the gods. He was also the inventor of writing, patron of scribes, of the arts and sciences. The moon, as a computer of time, was personified as Thoth but it was also represented by an ibis, or also by a man with the head of an ibis. As the god of writing, he is in fact also considered a scribe of the gods, inventor of all words and articulated language.

I would like to extrapolate the phrase “had authority over all the gods” to note how since the supposed antiquity they show us how language was capable of having power over all the gods and its greatest exponent could randomly assign names to all things, we can understand here that no natural being is born with a name, the name is not part of nature, we can thus understand that the first artifact or artificial entity created is nothing more and nothing less than the “name”, the name being the first artificial creation of this plane and being accepted and giving place allows access to all kinds of artificialities which are subject to the name as the original source of artificiality.

The name the identification

Arriving at this point, it is logical to verify how the name is the fundamental base, the cornerstone, of artificiality, therefore far from Natural Law. Mechanism that allowed the construction of a system where everything is based on the name, where jurisdiction is immediately admitted by “registering” the name of the newborn under the authority of a government/nation/state/corporation.

Once this ‘record’ of the name is created, a character from a literary work is generated, which exists only on paper and to which the ‘state’ that also exists on paper, that is, in the 2D plane, assigns roles, obligations, privileges and regulations and with the coercion of their representatives, real living beings, who believe they are acting under the authority of the non-existent entity called the ‘state’ forces whoever has deposited their nickname as a legal name under registration to associate with that person and identify themselves in the.

All this framework is known as “legal fiction” and to differentiate the real being from the fictitious entity/character inscribed on the paper, the mechanism called “deminutio capitis maxima” is used, which literally means the “maximum reduction of the capo/head”, which consists of inscribing the name in CAPITAL letters, thus the representatives of the non-existent entity called ‘state’ use the presumption that one associates and recognizes being that legal fiction by the simple fact of identifying themselves in the name of the character inscribed on the paper without knowing that they would be referring to the fictional character and not to the real being.

All this is so absurd that it seems incredible that such a perverse and at the same time inconsistent mechanism is still in force today, but technically this is exactly how today it is possible to impose an entity that regulates, decides, in all aspects of the life of each individual. and ultimately governs all of humanity.

Only with a deep understanding of who we are, where we are and why we are here can we begin to develop the consciousness necessary to create our own reality.

This Post Has One Comment

  1. C

    Heya i am for the first time һere. І found this board and I fіnd It really useful &
    it helped me out much. I hopе to give something back and helρ otherѕ like
    you аided me.

Leave a Reply